Category Archives: Daily Top Ten

Topley’s Top 10 – April 15, 2021

1. Bitcoin to Dollar Chart…Bitcoin +116% YTD.

www.stockcharts.com

2. But Ether Tops the Charts vs. Bitcoin

Advisor Perspectives-We have also created an index in order to chart these together given their very different pricing history. Notice that Ether tops the chart – the price of an ether has changed the most out of all three cryptocurrencies.

 

https://www.advisorperspectives.com/dshort/updates/2021/04/14/cryptocurrencies-through-4-13

3. S&P Equal Weighted +61%  vs. Cap Weighted 50% 1 Year Returns.

Equal Weighted S&P Outperforming by large margin over cap weighted coming out of Covid

www.yahoofinance.com

4. Coinbase Pricing from A-Shares to IPO

Andreessen Horowitz and Union Square are the two largest outside investors in Coinbase.

TECH

Here’s who just got rich from the Coinbase debut-Ari Levy@LEVYNEWS  https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/14/coinbase-who-gets-rich.html

5. Big Banks Catching Regional Bank Index YTD

The KBW Regional Banking Index has outperformed the KBW Bank Index year to date, although the latter – which represents 24 of the largest U.S. banks – has beaten the index of smaller institutions over the last month.

Graphic: KBW Bank index vs Regional banks

Reuters Graphic

Wall Street ends mixed despite bumper big-bank earningsBy Shivani KumaresanShreyashi SanyalDavid French

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-stocks/wall-street-ends-mixed-despite-bumper-big-bank-earnings-idUSKBN2C11AS

6. Wage Inflation?  CFO Survey

 Sustained inflation gains will require stronger wage growth. The latest Evercore ISI survey suggests that it’s a possibility.

Source: Evercore ISI

THE DAILY SHOT https://dailyshotbrief.com/the-daily-shot-brief-april-14th-2021/

7. CPI Month Over Month Print Highest Since 2006

Zero Hedge Investors increasingly convinced of Fed inflation tolerance

March CPI inflation came in like a lion and went out like a lamb, all in a day. The 0.34% m/m print on core inflation is the highest since 2006, other than July and August 2020, which were the bounce back from anomalously low readings during the height of the COVID-19 shutdowns

 

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/fed-has-convinced-investors-it-will-tolerate-higher-inflation

 8. Covid Stimulus Bigger Than Roosevelt New Deal

Jim Ried DB-The post-Covid fiscal stimulus in the US has been remarkable and is likely to continue to be given Biden’s infrastructure bill. Outside of wars, the only comparable interventions were in 2008 and in the 1930s with FDR’s new deal. However, how do these three extraordinary interventions compare?

DB’s Alan Ruskin produced this table last night with some relevant facts (see full piece here). Note that these numbers don’t yet include the infrastructure package.

cid0B732D95-FC8F-4189-9F73-675A49CA0EAB

Even without the proposed infrastructure package, the 2020/21 COVID cumulative response is extraordinary at over 5 times the size of the FDR 1930’s New Deal in 2020 dollars, and double the New Deal on a per capita basis. However, because GDP was so much smaller in the 1930s, the New Deal ultimately totaled some 40% of GDP, close to double the Trump and Biden COVID packages. The New Deal was spread out over a 6+ year period though.

In terms of output gaps, the 1930s saw one 10 times larger than the current c.3%. So relative to the respective output gaps, the fiscal injections today look much more aggressive than that seen nearly 90 years ago. Equity markets are also in a completely different place today (US financial conditions yesterday hit 14-year highs) and we would also highlight that US money supply growth is running at around +27% YoY currently whereas it had sharply declined in the 1930s.

Clearly, there are differences which Alan’s piece touches on but overall we think the post-covid US fiscal response is more remarkable than FDR’s New Deal in size and scale and that’s before the infrastructure plan. Given this, there still have to be huge questions and uncertainty over future inflation.

9. Harvard Hits 3% Acceptance Rate

One of the hardest universities to get into, Harvard, just got even harder. Harvard College has just released its admission statistics for the class of 2025, which reveals that just 1,968 applicants have been offered places, from a pool of more than 57,000 — which works out to an acceptance rate of just 3.4%. That’s the lowest acceptance rate in Harvard’s history.

The increase in applications is partly down to the removal of mandatory standardized testing (the SAT and ACT). The Wall Street Journal reports that over 1,600 four-year colleges did not require applicants to submit SAT or ACT scores, leading to an increase in applications.

While the 2020 numbers might be exaggerated because of the testing changes, it’s certainly true that acceptance rates at highly-selective institutions have been going down. Rightly or wrongly a (good) college or university education has become a pre-requisite for many jobs and industries, and competition for places has only become more intense — and a lot more expensive.  

https://www.chartr.co

10. How Psychologists Define Intelligence.

How psychologists define intelligence

Verywell / JR Bee 

While intelligence is one of the most talked about subjects in psychology, there is no standard definition of what exactly constitutes intelligence. Some researchers have suggested that intelligence is a single, general ability. Others believe that intelligence encompasses a range of aptitudes, skills, and talents.

What Is Intelligence?

Intelligence has been a controversial topic throughout psychology’s history. Despite the substantial interest in the subject, there is still considerable disagreement about what components makeup intelligence. In addition to questions of exactly how to define intelligence, the debate continues today about whether accurate measurements are even possible.https://912dec4b9314a9b2aeaf4bb264bb4148.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-38/html/container.html

At various points throughout recent history, researchers have proposed some different definitions of intelligence. While these definitions can vary considerably from one theorist to the next, current conceptualizations tend to suggest that intelligence is the ability to:

  • Learn from experience:The acquisition, retention, and use of knowledge is an important component of intelligence.
  • Recognize problems: To put knowledge to use, people must be able to identify possible problems in the environment that need to be addressed.
  • Solve problems:People must then be able to take what they have learned to come up with a useful solution to a problem they have noticed in the world around them.1

Intelligence involves some different mental abilities including logic, reasoning, problem-solving, and planning. While the subject of intelligence is one of the largest and most heavily researched, it is also one of the topics that generate the greatest controversy.

While psychologists often disagree about the definition and causes of intelligence, research on intelligence plays a significant role in many areas. These areas include decisions regarding how much funding should be given to educational programs, the use of testing to screen job applicants, and the use of testing to identify children who need additional academic help.https://912dec4b9314a9b2aeaf4bb264bb4148.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-38/html/container.html

Brief History of Intelligence

The term “intelligence quotient,” or IQ, was first coined in the early 20th century by a German psychologist named William Stern. Psychologist Alfred Binet developed the very first intelligence tests to help the French government identify schoolchildren who needed extra academic assistance. Binet was the first to introduce the concept of mental age or a set of abilities that children of a certain age possess.2

Since that time, intelligence testing has emerged as a widely used tool that has led to developing many other tests of skill and aptitude. However, it continues to spur debate and controversy over the use of such testing, cultural biases that may be involved, influences on intelligence, and even the very way we define intelligence.

Theories of Intelligence

Different researchers have proposed a variety of theories to explain the nature of intelligence. Here are some of the major theories of intelligence that have emerged during the last 100 years.https://912dec4b9314a9b2aeaf4bb264bb4148.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-38/html/container.html

General Intelligence

British psychologist Charles Spearman (1863–1945) described a concept he referred to as general intelligence or the g factor. After using a technique known as factor analysis to examine some mental aptitude tests, Spearman concluded that scores on these tests were remarkably similar.https://912dec4b9314a9b2aeaf4bb264bb4148.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-38/html/container.html

People who performed well on one cognitive test tended to perform well on other tests, while those who scored badly on one test tended to score badly on others. He concluded that intelligence is a general cognitive ability that can be measured and numerically expressed.3

Primary Mental Abilities

Psychologist Louis L.Thurstone (1887–1955) offered a differing theory of intelligence. Instead of viewing intelligence as a single, general ability, Thurstone’s theory focused on seven different primary mental abilities.4

  • Associative memory: The ability to memorize and recall
  • Numerical ability: The ability to solve arithmetic problems
  • Perceptual speed: The ability to see differences and similarities among objects
  • Reasoning: The ability to find rules
  • Spatial visualization: The ability to visualize relationships
  • Verbal comprehension: The ability to define and understand words
  • Word fluency: The ability to produce words rapidly

Theory of Multiple Intelligences

One of the more recent ideas to emerge is Howard Gardner‘s theory of multiple intelligences. Gardner proposed that the traditional idea of intelligence, based on IQ testing, did not fully and accurately depict a person’s abilities. His theory proposed eight different intelligences based on skills and abilities that are valued in different cultures:5

  • Bodily-kinesthetic intelligence: The ability to control your body movements and to handle objects skillfully
  • Interpersonal intelligence: The capacity to detect and respond appropriately to the moods, motivations, and desires of others
  • Intrapersonal intelligence: The capacity to be self-aware and in tune with inner feelings, values, beliefs, and thinking processes
  • Logical-mathematical intelligence: The ability to think conceptually and abstractly, and the capacity to discern logically or numerical patterns
  • Musical intelligence: The ability to produce and appreciate rhythm, pitch, and timbre
  • Naturalistic intelligence: The ability to recognize and categorize animals, plants, and other objects in nature
  • Verbal-linguistic intelligence: Well-developed verbal skills and sensitivity to the sounds, meanings, and rhythms of words
  • Visual-spatial intelligence: The capacity to think in images and pictures, to visualize accurately and abstractly

What Kind of Intelligence Do You Have?

Triarchic Theory of Intelligence

Psychologist Robert Sternberg defined intelligence as “mental activity directed toward purposive adaptation to, selection, and shaping of real-world environments relevant to one’s life.”

While he agreed with Gardner that intelligence is much broader than a single, general ability, he suggested that some of Gardner’s types of intelligence are better viewed as individual talents. Sternberg proposed what he referred to as “successful intelligence,” which involves three different factors:6

  • Analytical intelligence:Your ability to evaluate information and solve problems
  • Creative intelligence: Your ability to come up with new ideas
  • Practical intelligence: Your ability to adapt to a changing environment

Questions About Intelligence Testing

In order to gain a deeper understanding of intelligence and the tests developed to measure this concept, it’s important to understand the history of intelligence testing, the research that has been conducted, and the findings that have emerged.

Major questions about intelligence and IQ testing still include:

  • Are intelligence tests biased?
  • Is intelligence a single ability, or does it involve an assortment of multiple skills and abilities?
  • Is intelligence inherited, or does the environment play a larger role?
  • What do intelligence scores predict, if anything?

To explore these questions, psychologists have conducted a considerable amount of research on the nature, influences, and effects of intelligence.7

A Word From Verywell

While there has been considerable debate over the exact nature of intelligence, no definitive conceptualization has emerged. Today, psychologists often account for the many theoretical viewpoints when discussing intelligence and acknowledge that this debate is ongoing.

https://www.verywellmind.com/theories-of-intelligence-2795035

Lansing Street Advisors is a registered investment adviser with the State of Pennsylvania..
To the extent that content includes references to securities, those references do not constitute an offer or solicitation to buy, sell or hold such security as information is provided for educational purposes only. Articles should not be considered investment advice and the information contain within should not be relied upon in assessing whether or not to invest in any securities or asset classes mentioned. Articles have been prepared without regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive it. Securities discussed may not be suitable for all investors. Please keep in mind that a company’s past financial performance, including the performance of its share price, does not guarantee future results.
Material compiled by Lansing Street Advisors is based on publicly available data at the time of compilation. Lansing Street Advisors makes no warranties or representation of any kind relating to the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of the data and shall not have liability for any damages of any kind relating to the use such data.
Material for market review represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific point in time and is not intended to be a forecast of future events, or a guarantee of future results.
Indices that may be included herein are unmanaged indices and one cannot directly invest in an index. Index returns do not reflect the impact of any management fees, transaction costs or expenses. The index information included herein is for illustrative purposes only.

Topley’s Top 10 – April 13, 2021

1. S&P Profit Estimates

Earnings Kicks off this week – The 20 S&P 500 companies that reported earnings as of Thursday topped analyst estimates by 11% on average. That is about 1.5 times the average for those companies over the last three years and about triple the longer-term average – JPMorgan Chase is due to report Wednesday, and results from other big banks are also due during the week.

Dave Lutz at Jones Trading  

Continue reading

Topley’s Top 10 – April 12, 2021

1. Big $40 million options trade bets on near-term stock market tumble

By Reuters Staff- A MASSIVE TRADE IN THE U.S. OPTIONS MARKET ON THURSDAY APPEARS TO BE BETTING THAT THE CALM ENVELOPING U.S. STOCKS IN RECENT WEEKS WILL GIVE WAY TO A BIG RISE IN VOLATILITY OVER THE NEXT THREE MONTHS.

One or more traders laid out a roughly $40 million bet that the Cboe Volatility Index – often called Wall Street’s fear gauge – will break above the 25 level and rise towards 40 by mid-July, trading data showed Thursday.

The VIX closed at 16.95 on Thursday, its lowest close since February 20, 2020, just before the coronavirus pandemic spooked investors and roiled global financial marketSome 200,000 of the VIX July 25 – 40 call spread traded over the course of two hours on Thursday, starting at 10 a.m. The trades made up about a third of the average daily trading volume in VIX options, according to Trade Alert.

Continue reading

Topley’s Top 10 – April 7, 2021

1. Value and Growth History of 4 Cycles.

A Wealth of Common Sense Blog

Image

https://twitter.com/awealthofcs

2. Q1 2021 Earnings Estimate Growth Year Over Year

Energy, Financials and Materials Lead Earnings Growth Estimates.

https://www.factset.com/hubfs/Website/Resources%20Section/Research%20Desk/Earnings%20Insight/EarningsInsight_040121.pdf

3. Factor Grid 2008 Thru Q1 2021

2008-2020 Growth Huge Leadership.

www.dorseywright.com

4. LQD Corporate Bond ETF Worse Month of Outflows in 20 Year History

Biggest Credit ETF Bleeds $3.6 Billion in Worst-Ever Month-by Katie Greifeld, 4/1/21

After a blowout 2020 for corporate debt, exchange-traded fund investors are quickly souring on those bonds.

The world’s largest credit ETF notched its worst month of outflows since it began trading about two decades ago. Traders pulled roughly $3.6 billion from the iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ticker LQD) in March, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. That exodus came as the $42 billion fund suffered its biggest quarterly rout in 12 years.

https://www.advisorperspectives.com/articles/2021/04/01/biggest-credit-etf-bleeds-3-6-billion-in-worst-ever-month

LQD -5% YTD bouncing off bottom

www.stockcharts.com

5. Best 1-month performers are funds involved with construction, manufacturing, or production – or the raw materials 

ETFONE-MONTH RETURN
Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF BDRY, -3.51%30.9%
VanEck Vectors Steel ETF SLX, -0.95%14.9%
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF XSVM, -0.77%13.9%
SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF XHB, +0.87%13.5%
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF COWZ, +0.02%13.2%
iShares US Home Construction ETF ITB, +0.68%12.9%
SPDR S&P Retail ETF XRT, +0.36%12.5%
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF RWJ, -0.22%12%
First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund FXU, +0.30%11.8%
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF RYU, +0.39%11.6%
Source: Refinitiv Lipper

Safe haven plays still popular amid rotation into cyclical stocks, March fund flows show

By Andrea Riquier

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/safe-haven-plays-still-popular-amid-rotation-into-cyclical-stocks-march-fund-flows-show-11617712786

6. XLF Financials ETF Chart

XLF-Financials ETF 50 week moving average about to cross 200 week moving average first time since 2012

Still, Maley said the longer-term setup looks incredibly strong for the financials.

“The 50-week moving average is getting very close to the 200-week moving average. In other words, it’s getting very close to a golden cross on a weekly basis. Golden crosses tend to be bullish on a daily basis on the charts, but when you get it on a weekly basis, it’s even more so. In fact we haven’t seen one of those crosses since 2012,” said Maley.

“That time, we’d also seen a big rally, and when the golden cross took place, it extended to a much further rally over the next several years,” Maley added.

A golden cross is formed when a 50-period moving average moves above the 200-period. It is a bullish formation that suggests an accelerating trend to the upside.

From June 2012 to a peak in August 2015, the XLF nearly doubled in price. Maley said he’d be looking to buy the group on weakness, while keeping an eye on whether a golden cross is seen in the charts.

Financial stocks set up for a bullish pattern not seen in nearly a decade, according to chart

Keris Lahiff@KERISALISON

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/06/financial-stocks-set-up-for-extremely-bullish-move-chart-suggests.html

7. Change in Migration Major Metro Area Gainers and Losers.

Tierra Partners, @tierrapartners

From CBRE migration patterns 2019 vs 2020 for major MSAs

Image

https://twitter.com/tierrapartners

8. The Share of Home Purchase Applications for Second Homes hits 14%

Wolf Street 

The share of purchase mortgage applications in February for second homes and investment properties has soared to 14.1% of total purchase mortgage applications, according to data by the Mortgage Bankers Association, cited and charted by the Wall Street Journal:

https://wolfstreet.com/2021/04/01/the-explosive-surge-of-mortgages-for-second-homes-housing-bubble-math/

9. Millennials and Gen Z Sources of Investing Information

Magnify Money Blog

Survey: Nearly 60% of Young Investors Are Collaborating – MagnifyMoney

10. 7 Myths About Optimism and Pessimism

Defensive pessimism can help to manage anxiety and provide a sense of control.

Marianna Pogosyan Ph.D.

Between Cultures

SUMMARY

·         Past research has demonstrated that optimism can benefit happiness, relationships, and health.

·         But defensive pessimism—setting low expectations and considering worst-case scenarios—can help reduce anxiety.

·         Defensive pessimism is most useful when negative outcomes are important to consider and when they can be prevented.

Optimism is among the most celebrated human qualities. Many studies have shown that optimists tend to fare better in life than their pessimistic friends—at least when it comes to physical and mental healthresiliencerelationshipscareerpain management, and even longevity. Being of good cheer and expecting the best, as science and cultural dogmas have us believe, will lead to the best. 

But is it all that straightforward? Is optimism always adaptive, and is there really nothing good about being a pessimist? 

Psychologist Julie Norem’s research suggests otherwise. 

For almost four decades, Dr. Norem has been studying the phenomenon of defensive pessimism—the cognitive strategy of setting low expectations and considering worst-case scenarios of future events. It turns out, the habit of not getting your hopes high can help with managing anxiety and gaining a sense of control.

In her latest research, Dr. Norem found that the use of defensive pessimism was correlated with taking more precautions during the Covid-19 pandemic (e.g., hand-washing, mask-wearing, social distancing), and less risky behaviors (e.g., meeting inside with people you don’t live with). “Without a doubt, defensive pessimists are more anxious than their optimistic counterparts,” explains Dr. Norem, “but they also actively make more effort to manage their risk.”

One of the biggest surprises from Dr. Norem’s research is the public’s hesitation towards the mere idea of there being something positive about pessimism. Yet, perhaps ironically, when people discover that they are defensive pessimists, many report feeling relief and validation.

Here is Dr. Norem, in her own words, on 7 myths about optimism and pessimism, 2 examples when defensive pessimism is most effective, and 2 ways to foster optimism.

1. One is either an optimist or a pessimist.

False. People’s perspectives vary from domain to domain. For example, you can be optimistic about your social life and pessimistic about your work. Furthermore, we can consider optimism-pessimism as a tendency to expect good or bad things (trait level); or as how prone people are to experience positive-negative affect (temperamental level).

These are tendencies—they are not deterministic of specific expectations in specific situations. While these tendencies can be influenced by genetics, they merely point us in a certain direction. We still have freedom to move. 

2. Optimists are born, not made. 

This myth is too all-encompassing to be true. While we don’t have much evidence that we can get rid of our tendencies to experience negative affect, cognitive therapy studies suggest that people can learn to revise how they look at situations. It’s not easy, but it’s possible.

article continues after advertisement

3. Being an optimist is always better than being a pessimist.

False. Research from Japan finds that defensive pessimists do better than optimists in terms of affect and actual performance. Studies from the U.S. show that, on average, defensive pessimists do as well as optimists. Defensive pessimists have more negative affect, but not necessarily less positive affect.

In the U.S., the commonly held belief is that when it comes to positive affect, the more, the better. If you are feeling negative emotions, you are often motivated to get rid of them, because it makes you feel like you are failing at something. In other cultures, including Japan, the ideal affective life is more balanced. A well-adjusted person recognizes that there are negatives and positives in most things in life and allows herself to experience both.

4. Pessimists are more likely to get depressed than optimists.

True—in terms of general traits, pessimists are more at risk of depression. However, the overall picture is more complicated. Research shows that defensive pessimists are actually less likely to get depressed than other pessimists, and not significantly more likely than optimists. What increases the risk of depression is when pessimism is combined with hopelessness. That is, when pessimists don’t feel like they have any control over their circumstances.

Here, the distinction between defensive pessimism and fatalistic pessimism is important. Defensive pessimists are oriented towards making things better in their lives or getting things done. Fatalistic pessimists, on the other hand, might have the same underlying tendency to experience negative emotions, but instead of actively looking for what they could do in the world, they assume that they are fated to be the way they are and that there is no hope. That’s the pathway that tends to lead to depression. 

5. Optimism is a key ingredient in human flourishing, while pessimism is a key impediment to well-being. 

This myth is overly simplified and reductionistic. If you define flourishing primarily in terms of positive emotions, optimism indeed makes it much more likely for you to experience positive emotions. But since that is correlated with the temperamental tendency to experience positive emotions, it’s not clear what comes first. It’s also unclear that what relates positive emotions to optimism is relevant to people who aren’t optimistic—it’s not like people can just pretend to be optimistic and things will necessarily get better for them. 

6. Pessimists can also be happy.

True. The value that people place on happiness as an outcome varies enormously. Defensive pessimists certainly have many moments of happiness and enjoy many things in their lives. But that’s not where their focus is. Instead, they want to not have regrets and work towards their goals. They want to feel as if they did their best in a given situation and they want to manage their anxiety so it doesn’t interfere with their goals.

Moreover, defensive pessimists are able to tolerate negative emotions. For many people, once they recognize that they are anxious, their primary goal becomes to get rid of anxiety and to feel happy. The strength of defensive pessimists lies in their ability to say, “I recognize that I feel anxious. I know what to do with this anxiety and I’m not going to let it get in my way.” It’s different than denying it or trying to suppress or avoid it. 

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/between-cultures/202104/7-myths-about-optimism-and-pessimism

Lansing Street Advisors is a registered investment adviser with the State of Pennsylvania..
To the extent that content includes references to securities, those references do not constitute an offer or solicitation to buy, sell or hold such security as information is provided for educational purposes only. Articles should not be considered investment advice and the information contain within should not be relied upon in assessing whether or not to invest in any securities or asset classes mentioned. Articles have been prepared without regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive it. Securities discussed may not be suitable for all investors. Please keep in mind that a company’s past financial performance, including the performance of its share price, does not guarantee future results.
Material compiled by Lansing Street Advisors is based on publicly available data at the time of compilation. Lansing Street Advisors makes no warranties or representation of any kind relating to the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of the data and shall not have liability for any damages of any kind relating to the use such data.
Material for market review represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific point in time and is not intended to be a forecast of future events, or a guarantee of future results.
Indices that may be included herein are unmanaged indices and one cannot directly invest in an index. Index returns do not reflect the impact of any management fees, transaction costs or expenses. The index information included herein is for illustrative purposes only.